[coreboot] [PATCH] fix normal vs. fallback
mylesgw at gmail.com
Thu Jul 8 20:09:01 CEST 2010
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Patrick Georgi <patrick at georgi-clan.de> wrote:
> Am 08.07.2010 19:50, schrieb Myles Watson:
>> BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL allows the user to use CMOS values to select which
>> image to boot. This patch:
>> - makes BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL depend on USE_OPTION_TABLE
> This would prevent the "old" scheme of building a fallback image (which
> is built first) with BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL and _no_ USE_OPTION_TABLE (so it
> uses the hardcoded defaults) and a normal image with USE_OPTION_TABLE.
So I probably went too far. I should have made it depend on HAVE_OPTION_TABLE.
>> - makes compilation of bootblock.inc depend on OPTION_TABLE_H
> How does this interact with BOOTBLOCK_SIMPLE builds without
It shouldn't make a difference. OPTION_TABLE_H is empty if there isn't one.
More information about the coreboot