The wiki is being retired!
Documentation is now handled by the same processes we use for code: Add something to the Documentation/ directory in the coreboot repo, and it will be rendered to https://doc.coreboot.org/. Contributions welcome!
Google Summer of Code 2009
Your own Projects
We've listed some ideas for projects here, but we're more than happy to entertain other ideas if you've got any. Feel free to contact us under the address below, and don't hesitate to suggest whatever you have in mind.
Infrastructure for automatic code checking
We already have a build bot that builds various configurations of coreboot. It would be nice to extend it with various code validation routines, for example:
- Validate that there's no regression in doxygen documentation (eg. are all arguments to functions still explained in @param tags, eg. after new arguments were added?)
- Make code lint clean (and maybe extend lint to not fall into our traps), and run lint over the tree. Report regressions
- Use LLVM's static code checking facilities, report regressions.
- Work on code coverage support for coreboot code (dump data into ram, or via serial. Provide tools to fetch it). Analyse that data.
Summer of Code Application
Please complete the standard Google SoC 2008 application. Additionally, please provide information on the following:
- Who are you? What are you studying?
- Why are you the right person for this task?
- Do you have any other commitments that we should know about?
- List your C, Assembler or Java experience. (Depending on the project)
- List your history with open source projects.
- What is your preferred method of contact? (Phone, email, Skype, etc)
Feel free to keep your application short. A 15 page essay is no better than a 2 page summary. If you wish to write 15 pages, you are of course welcome to do so, and we will gladly put your paper up on the web page. But it is not required for the application.
The Drupal project has a great page on How to write an SOC application.
DEADLINE FOR STUDENT APPLICATIONS: Students who are interested in working on a coreboot-related GSoC project must apply between March 24, 2008 and March 30, 2008!
If you are interested in becoming a GSoC student, please contact Stefan Reinauer.
There is also an IRC channel on irc.freenode.net: #coreboot
SCSI booting in coreboot
Currently coreboot can not boot from an arbitrary SCSI controller. There are two solutions for the problem:
- Use Linux and Kexec. This requires to keep the SCSI driver in the flash chip.
- Use x86emu/vm86/ADLO and the int13 method. This would allow to use the PCI option rom available on all modern SCSI controllers.
So we obviously need a solution based on the later. This could as well be implemented as a Linux program, as an intermediate payload, or as a shared library.
The code you are going to write needs to catch the int13 interrupt vector that the SCSI option rom installs and make it available to arbitrary (firmware/payload) code trying to load something from disk.
This is a coreboot v3 project.
All Virtual All The Time (AVATT)
The goal here is to build a system that comes up running Linux and KVM from power on reset. From that point the system could boot anything -- Windows, Linux, *BSD, Plan 9 -- anything that runs on x86 32 and 64-bit architectures. Coreboot would be integrated with a Linux kernel and initrd that had KVM built in. The initrd would include the minimal set of tools needed for starting new KVM virtual machine guests. Note that Linux booting from coreboot is a solved problem, using the buildrom tool, so the main effort here is to develop a minimal KVM infrastructure that can fit in a 2Mbyte FLASH part. Linux + X11 have been demonstrated in a 1Mbyte part, so we feel that this task is not impossible, but will be a terrific learning experience for a student, and will provide the community with a valuable resource when it is finished. The Xen and KVM communities have both asked for this capability for some time now, so there is a group of people ready to use this system when it is finished.
Booting Windows and other Operating Systems in LinuxBIOS 
The goal of this sub project is to figure out how to boot Windows Vista/XP/2003. There are three approaches that might proof successful:
- using a dedicated LinuxBIOS loader (ie. adapting ReactOS FREELDR)
- booting Windows on top of Linux using kexec/kboot
- fixing ADLO so that it boots Vista/XP and removing the mainboard dependencies in it's code.
- Some information on usage of bios services in Windows can be found here and here.
Port GRUB2 to work in LinuxBIOS
GRUB2 is going to be _the_ bootloader of choice in the forseeable future. As such, it could replace both Grub legacy and FILO, the LinuxBIOS hack for grub compatibility. FILO lacks many features that come with GRUB2 with no extra effort.
This task splits into four sub-problems:
- Add a target i386-linuxbios, next to i386-pc and i386-efi to the configuration process
- Add an IDE driver that does direct access instead of intXX calls
- Make the build process generate a single static ELF image, like it is done on Sparc
- Add support for reading the memory size from the LinuxBIOS table.
CMOS Config / Device Tree Browser Payload
Unlike other BIOSes, Linux has no such thing as a "CMOS setup". This does not mean that you can not configure it. There is a nice and small Linux command line utility called lxbios for that purpose. But people are often asking for a builtin config tool. Such a config tool could feature VGA graphics (maybe even VESA?), it should be easy to use, allow to browse information from LinuxBIOS' central structure: the device tree, and provide lxbios functionality with some sex appeal.
This is a LinuxBIOSv3 project.
Open Firmware payload for LinuxBIOS
Mitch Bradley from Firmworks, Inc. released the Open Firmware sources under a BSD license. The released code does work in LinuxBIOS, but could use some proper integration and testing on some hardware or in Qemu.
- The released Open Firmware code is very much optimized towards the OLPC. A lot of things don't work yet on other systems, such as using a graphical framebuffer. Therefore things in LinuxBIOS need to be changed. For example, if LinuxBIOS initializes a graphics mode, it should add a LinuxBIOS table entry that specifies the address of the framebuffer and the depth and resolution.
- Add words to view the LinuxBIOS table in OFW
- Add words to change LinuxBIOS CMOS settings from OFW
- For LinuxBIOSv3, the start address of the payload can be variable. This is a fundamental change to v2, and will make life a lot easier and LinuxBIOS a lot more flexible. OFW requires to know its in-rom address at build time. This needs to be fixed to a dynamic behavior
- Also, there's no good documentation on what features can be used and how they can be used. Like the graphical OLPC menu, the built-in web server.
- Get a STOP-A like behavior working in Linux
- Get Smart Firmware working with new compilers
- Get Smart Firmware working as a payload
- Enhance the Distributed and Automated Testsystem to work with FILO and OpenFirmware payloads, and add The Hayes ANS Forth testsuite.
Some parts might require cooperation with other GSoC projects:
- Boot from Non-OFW SCSI controllers by running their int13 handler
- Boot Windows XP/2003/Vista in OFW
This project might benefit from Forth skills.
GNUFI or TianoCore payloads
This project requires no hardware skills, but especially in case of TianoCore might require knowledge of Windows compilers (VC2005?)
Boot OpenSolaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD or other free OSes
LinuxBIOS has (despite its name) been a little Linux centric. A nice project would be to analyze what it takes to get OpenSolaris, the BSDs or other free operating systems to work in LinuxBIOS, without the need for legacy emulation (ie. no ADLO)
Improve Linux as a BIOS 
There's a small project called  which creates a payload from a Linux kernel and some user space utilities. It has been written to work with the OLPC. This project could be enhanced to work on all supported LinuxBIOS motherboards.
Porting Flashrom utility to Windows 2000/XP
Flashrom is used to burn LinuxBIOS binary to flash chips in the target motherboards. It runs on Unix/Linux. In this project the flashrom utility is ported from Linux/Unix to Windows 2000/XP. The Windows port is called Winflashrom. The project is divided into two tasks. The first task is to port most of the user space flashrom source code to MinGW and the second task is to code a Windows device driver to provide direct hardware access for the user space code. The difficulty of this task is in providing a reliable Windows device driver for the user space code.