[coreboot] coreboot BIOSisms
kevin at koconnor.net
Wed Jun 11 01:02:26 CEST 2008
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:46:07AM -0400, Joseph Smith wrote:
> > Given the above, I see two possibilities.
> > The first involves having coreboot build the standard tables.
> Like I said why not just have a mini program between the two that handles
> this operation.
Where does this "mini program" get the data? It will face the same
issues I outlined in my previous email.
>It could be added to coreboot or legacybios as an option
> module. The mini program would read the coreboot tables and what ever else
> it needed and then set these tables up in a format that coresponds with
> legacybios, and finally passes the tables to legacybios.
The coreboot table today does not provide sufficient information to
build the acpi/pir/mptable/smbios tables.
We could extend the coreboot table - but what's the point of defining
our own intermediate format. For example, if the end consumer wants
an smbios table, why translate from "coreboot->coreboot
table->legacybios->smbios table" when we can just go from
>Does it have to be more complicated than that?
Adding an additional program in between seems to make things more
More information about the coreboot