[coreboot] Any plans to fix payload builds on 64-bit machines?
Sean McNeil
seanmcneil3 at gmail.com
Thu May 22 05:36:06 CEST 2014
The below problem is known and fixed in the newer binutils. I changed
buildgcc to:
-BINUTILS_VERSION=2.23.2
+BINUTILS_VERSION=2.24
and everything builds fine. So please confirm that CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN
is deprecated and to be removed. If there are no plans to support it, in
my opinion it should not be provided as a choice.
Cheers,
Sean
On 05/22/2014 09:59 AM, Sean McNeil wrote:
> I've tried your suggestion. Building binutils on my 64-bit Fedora 20
> system:
>
> ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:325: unknown command
> `colophon'
> ../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:336: unknown command `cygnus'
> make[3]: *** [bfd.info] Error 1
>
> I have texinfo-5.1-4.fc20.x86_64 installed.
>
> On 05/22/2014 02:42 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Sean McNeil <seanmcneil3 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:seanmcneil3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Are you bullding on 64-bit machine and have:
>>
>>
>> CONFIG_COMPILER_GCC=y
>> CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN=y
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
>> CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN should not be used in most cases. What does your
>> .xcompile file look like?
>>
>> I'm building on a 64-bit host using the crossgcc toolchain. Try
>> running the buildgcc script in util/crossgcc, then rm -f .xcompile
>> and run make and see if that helps.
>>
>> For reference, here are my .xcompile and .config files as well as the
>> output from make.
>>
>> xcompile.txt
>> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNLVhwSHh4V0VWY28/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>
>> config.txt
>> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNZ2hEcENPQ2kwSHM/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>
>> make.txt
>> <https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNY1phV0c4c0MtM0U/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>
>>
>>
>> arch/x86/exec.S:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous
>> definition
>> /*
>> ^
>> arch/x86/exec.S: Assembler messages:
>> arch/x86/exec.S:43: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:45: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:53: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:54: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:61: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:62: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:70: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:73: Error: operand type mismatch for `call'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:81: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:91: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:92: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:93: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>> arch/x86/exec.S:97: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
>> make[2]: *** [build/arch/x86/exec.libc.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [libpayload] Error 2
>> make: *** [filo] Error 2
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/21/2014 10:36 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Sean McNeil
>>> <seanmcneil3 at gmail.com <mailto:seanmcneil3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> All the recent changes to how the compiler is defined have
>>> now caused payloads like FILO and SeaBIOS to not build on
>>> X86_64 machines. Is anyone working to fix this?
>>>
>>>
>>> I just tried building images with each of those as payloads and
>>> they seemed to compile fine for me. Try "rm -f .xcompile" before
>>> compiling and see if that helps.
>>>
>>> If that doesn't work, can you post more details such as the git
>>> version you're on and output of "make" ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Hendricks (dhendrix)
>>> Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Hendricks (dhendrix)
>> Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20140522/4dd54413/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the coreboot
mailing list